JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)August 31, 2016

A- de 2016

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Alberto Rojas Ríos

✓Claimant Eduardo Montealegre Lynnet Y Otro

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

2 topics · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Con el presente auto se RECHAZA la recusación formulada en contra del Magistrado Jorge Ignacio Pretelt Chaljub, para conocer el recurso de súplica presentado por el Procurador General de la Nación al Auto del 19 de mayo de 2016, dentro del proceso de inconstitucionalidad de la referencia.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. RECHAZAR la recusación formulada por los ciudadanos Eduardo Montealegre Lynnet y Rafael José Lafont Rodríguez contra el Magistrado Jorge Ignacio Pretelt Chaljub en relación con el proceso de constitucionalidad D-11532, en los términos de la parte motiva de esta providencia.
  2. Segundo. Por Secretaría General, REMÍTASE el expediente D-11532 al Despacho al cual fue repartido originalmente, con el fin de que continúe con el trámite correspondiente.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.